Gillette Mach 3 Blades Alternative

£10.00

4.44 out of 5
(9 customer reviews)

Gillette Mach 3 Blades Are Expensive! Try our alternative razor instead & Save over 40% off Gillette RRP’s.

Razor Handle
8x Three Bladed cartridges
Blade Travel Cover
Shave Gel

The blades are just as good as Gillette Mach 3, all with the same features;
Microfins that stretch skin for a close shave
Vitamin E and Aloe Lubrication reduces skin irritation
Trimmer blade for hard-to-reach places

100% Satisfaction or money back!

Thousands of customers have already switched, read what they had to says below…

In stock

SKU : MAC-ALT Category :

Customer Reviews

  1. 5 out of 5

    I recently changed from my expensive Gillette Mach 3 blades to these and I’m absolutely delighted with Clean Shaven. They do everything the more expensive blades do and last longer than expected. Just waiting for a power version for an even closer shave.

  2. 5 out of 5

    So glad I found Clean Shaven on the internet, the razor blades are excellent, as good as Gillette Mach 3 blades and at a fraction of the cost. Will order more from Clean Shaven in the future.

  3. 3 out of 5

    I purchased the trial to compare with the Gillette Blades. I Started with the CS3 Blades. I found it difficult to shave without getting nicks & cuts on my face. I tried for a week., but got no improvement.. I went back to my old razor for a few days to let my face recover. I’ve now started on the CS5 blade. This is so much better than the 3 blade. So far I’ve had several very smooth and comfortable shaves, without any nicks or cuts. Will continue the trial.

  4. 5 out of 5

    Was not expecting it to be as good as a Gillette product. I have been using Mach 3 turbo then moved to Fusion Proglide blades. I tried clean shaven and it’s actually better that Gillette products. Almost too sharp. I shave my head and face. Works better than perfect and cheaper!!

  5. 5 out of 5

    Was a bit worried that something so much cheaper than shop brands would be a cheap imitation how wrong I was, not only were they a lot cheaper they give a better shave and last longer best gamble I ever took, well done me, well done Cleanshaven.

  6. 5 out of 5

    As good as mach 3 or better and much cheaper and no risk of dodgy dealers copies. First Class.

  7. 5 out of 5

    I ordered the 3 blade razor a few weeks ago after searching for a better, more cost affective alternative to the Gillette Mach 3 that has been my razor of choice for a number of years. After receiving these new blades, I was rather apprehensive about using them as they also came with a warning email before I had even used it. This said that it was similar to shaving with a cutthroat razor! This made me nervous. However, my worries were unjustified.
    As long as you don’t press the razor too hard on your face, a peach like, soft outcome is acheivable. Absolutely brilliant. I had to find Clean Shaven through a web search, but it has been well worth it.

  8. 2 out of 5

    Not impressed ,the shave was no better than my Gillette the only plus was the blade lasted a little longer. I will stick with my mach 3.

  9. 5 out of 5

    This post is perhaps not, in one respect what Clean Shaven want to hear but here goes. After being ripped off a few times with imitation blades of the one that I have used for many years it was with some hesitation that I decided to give it one last go and order blades from Clean Shaven.

    I would put my facial hairs into the medium to heavy category but always managed to make a Gillette Mach 3 blades last approximately three weeks with rip offs lasting a mere two days ! What a surprise that the Clean Shaven blade has performed as well if not better than the Gillette blade lasting just under four weeks. Sorry Clean Shaven Im not going to be a volume user!

    I ordered 24 blades thinking that each would only last perhaps two weeks so now, and Im not complaining have potentially a two year stock in hand !

    Star rating? Without any hesitation whatsoever a full 5/5.

Add Review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *